{"id":635,"date":"2010-03-30T09:05:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-30T09:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/2010\/03\/30\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/"},"modified":"2024-05-08T00:04:21","modified_gmt":"2024-05-08T04:04:21","slug":"mental-examinations-in-civil-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"Mental Examinations in Civil Cases"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 35<\/strong> (the rules that govern civil litigation in South Carolina courts) gives a court the authority to order a party to submit to a mental or physical exam when the mental or physical condition is in controversy. &#8220;Good cause&#8221; must be shown by the moving party, and the total amount in controversy must exceed $100,000.<\/p>\n<p>The Fall 2009 issue of The Justice Bulletin published an article about <strong>Rule 35 independent mental examinations<\/strong> that discussed the issue of bias in such examinations and the protections against such bias. James L. Ward, Jr. and Catherine H. McElveen, <em>Rule 35: Independent Mental Examinations &#8212; How Recordation of Independent Mental Examinations Can Ensure Impartiality in the Examination Room Interview<\/em>, The Justice Bulletin, p. 24, Fall 2009.As with any expert witness testimony, the resulting testimony of a Rule 35 mental or medical examination may be attacked from a number of angles for bias (due to the expert being a &#8220;hired gun&#8221;). However, <strong>Rule 35 exams<\/strong> are also susceptible to claims of bias because they do not provide the same protections for the examinee that a deposition would afford. For example, with a Rule 35 exam, there is no requirement that the examinee be represented or that the exam be recorded in any way.<\/p>\n<p>This absence of representation can lead to the exam becoming a <strong>de facto deposition<\/strong>, after which the expert&#8217;s report is the only record upon which counsel may rely. However, this can be combated in three ways:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Requesting the presence of counsel<\/li>\n<li>Requesting the presence of a third party representative<\/li>\n<li>Requesting the use of audio or video recordation.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>The presence of counsel, a third party representative, or recording device, however, can turn what is supposed to be an independent and scientific exam into an adversarial contest.<\/p>\n<p>All things being considered, it is most likely that a court would grant a request for the presence of an audio or video recording device in a <strong>Rule 35 exam<\/strong>, as it is the least obtrusive means to provide some safeguard to the examinee while still maintaining as much of the one-on-one comfort level associated with a private examination and discussion as possible.<\/p>\n<p><em>The information relayed in this blog is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. The cases referenced and explained by the blog&#8217;s author(s) are for informational purposes only and are not intended to imply that certain, or similar, results may be achieved in each client&#8217;s case.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 35 (the rules that govern civil litigation in South Carolina courts) gives a court the authority to order a party to submit to a mental or physical exam when the mental or physical condition is in controversy. &#8220;Good cause&#8221; must be shown by the moving party, and the&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":65,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-personal-injury","entry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n<title>Mental Examinations in Civil Cases | George Sink<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 35 (the rules that govern civil litigation in South Carolina courts) gives a court the authority to order a\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mental Examinations in Civil Cases | George Sink\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 35 (the rules that govern civil litigation in South Carolina courts) gives a court the authority to order a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"George Sink Injury Lawyers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sinklawfirm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-30T09:05:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-05-08T04:04:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Trudy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@SinkLawFirm\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@SinkLawFirm\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Trudy\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mental Examinations in Civil Cases | George Sink","description":"South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 35 (the rules that govern civil litigation in South Carolina courts) gives a court the authority to order a","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mental Examinations in Civil Cases | George Sink","og_description":"South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 35 (the rules that govern civil litigation in South Carolina courts) gives a court the authority to order a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/","og_site_name":"George Sink Injury Lawyers","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sinklawfirm","article_published_time":"2010-03-30T09:05:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-05-08T04:04:21+00:00","author":"Trudy","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@SinkLawFirm","twitter_site":"@SinkLawFirm","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Trudy","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/"},"author":{"name":"Trudy","@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2cf527896826feb585f13cea3f7750a0"},"headline":"Mental Examinations in Civil Cases","datePublished":"2010-03-30T09:05:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-08T04:04:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/"},"wordCount":410,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Personal Injury"],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/","url":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/","name":"Mental Examinations in Civil Cases | George Sink","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-30T09:05:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-05-08T04:04:21+00:00","description":"South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 35 (the rules that govern civil litigation in South Carolina courts) gives a court the authority to order a","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Personal Injury","item":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/category\/personal-injury\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Mental Examinations in Civil Cases","item":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/blog\/mental-examinations-in-civil-cases\/"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/","name":"George Sink","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/#organization","name":"George Sink Injury Lawyers","url":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/profile-picture.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/profile-picture.jpg","width":250,"height":250,"caption":"George Sink Injury Lawyers"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sinklawfirm","https:\/\/x.com\/SinkLawFirm","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/sinklaw\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/george-sink-p-a-injury-lawyers\/","https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/sinklaw\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/c\/Sinklaw\/about"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2cf527896826feb585f13cea3f7750a0","name":"Trudy"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/65"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=635"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/635\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sinklaw.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}